From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carbonelli v. Bremer

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 7, 1946
186 Misc. 348 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

February 7, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan TONEY, J.

Sidney S. Hodes and Lester M. Friedman for appellant.

Michael H. Cardozo, Jr., and Jeanne Kasten for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


On its face the petition is insufficient to sustain the summary proceeding. Although, as stated, the certificate authorized the landlord to maintain the proceeding so that she may occupy the apartment as her dwelling, there is no allegation in the petition that any such occupancy is desired; none of the exceptions to subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area ( 8 Federal Register 13914, 13917) is pleaded; and the certificate is manifestly insufficient to confer jurisdiction. ( Shelton Management Corp. v. Rosenkrantz, 184 Misc. 355; Gilroy v. Becker, 186 Misc. 93. )

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Carbonelli v. Bremer

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 7, 1946
186 Misc. 348 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Carbonelli v. Bremer

Case Details

Full title:SYBIL K. CARBONELLI, Landlord, Respondent, v. HERMANN F. BREMER, Tenant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1946

Citations

186 Misc. 348 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
60 N.Y.S.2d 682

Citing Cases

Giannini v. Stuart

The requirement is particularly applicable in all eviction proceedings based upon an allegation of decontrol,…

949-957 Park Ave. Corp. v. Hansen

In the circumstances the landlord was required to allege and prove it came within the exceptions. There is…