From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caranchini v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01089-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01089-AWI-DLB PC

10-13-2011

BENJAMIN M. CARANCHINI, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER


(DOC. 8)


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN EIGHTEEN

DAYS

Plaintiff Benjamin M. Caranchini ("Plaintiff") is formerly a California state prisoner. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On July 5, 2011, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to either consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in this action. Doc 4. On August 23, 2011, the Court issued a second order regarding consent or decline. Doc. 8. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within eighteen (18) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Caranchini v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01089-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Caranchini v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN M. CARANCHINI, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01089-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)