'" Id. (quoting Jones v Cannon, 174 F.3d 1271, 1286 n.8 (11th Cir. 1999)).See also Martin v. Marinez, 934 F.3d 594, 602 (7th Cir. 2019) (noting that "false arrest does not permit damages incurred after an indictment"); Caraffa v. Tempe (AZ) Police Dep't, No. CV-19-05492-PHX-MTL (ESW) 2019 WL 6841743, at *2 (D. Ariz. Dec. 16, 2019) ("Reflective of the fact that false imprisonment consists of detention without legal process, a false imprisonment ends once the victim becomes held pursuant to such process[.]") (citation omitted; emphasis in original); Pierre v. City of Rochester, No. 16-CV-6428 CJS, 2018 WL 10072453, at *11 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2018) ("[A] claim for false arrest only pertains to the period between arrest and arraignment or indictment, whichever occurs first."); Mohajerin v. Pinal Cty., No. CV-07-1746-PHX-DGC, 2007 WL 4358254, at *4 (D. Ariz. Dec. 7, 2007) ("The operative word in this context is 'false,' not 'imprisonment' - a false imprisonment claim ends when the detention is validated by legal process, not when the imprisonment itself ends."); Gurley v. Nat'l Wholesale Liquidator Warehouse, No. CIV.05-5405 (KSH), 2007 WL 2509672, at *4 n.4 (D.N.J. Aug. 30, 2007) ("[D]amages for a false arrest claim cover the time of detention up until issuance of process, i.e., indictment, arraignment or a prelimin