From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caracciolo v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 30, 1998
720 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-3200.

November 30, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Nikki Clark, Judge.

Anthony Caracciolo, Appellant, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Caryl S. Kilinski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The dismissal of appellant's petition for writ of mandamus is affirmed. However, while we agree that the petition was frivolous, the language which states that appellant is subject to forfeiture of gaintime pursuant to sections 944.279 and 944.28(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1996), is stricken. It is undisputed that the petition was filed well before the July 1, 1996, effective date of those statutes.

JOANOS, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caracciolo v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 30, 1998
720 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Caracciolo v. Singletary

Case Details

Full title:Anthony CARACCIOLO, Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 30, 1998

Citations

720 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)