From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capps v. Ciolli

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 21, 2021
1:20-cv-00766-SAB-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00766-SAB-HC

12-21-2021

DENNIS CAPPS, Petitioner, v. CIOLLI, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO STAY

(ECF No. 28

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Respondent has moved to stay the instant proceeding pending adjudication of Petitioner's 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion for compassionate release, which is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. (ECF No. 28). To date, Petitioner has not filed any opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to stay, and the time for doing so has passed.

Both the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition before this Court and Petitioner's supplemental authority in support of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion for compassionate release filed in the sentencing court raise similar issues regarding whether Petitioner's prior state convictions qualify for enhanced sentencing. See Notice, United States v. Capps, No. 1:11-cr-00108-AGF (E.D. Mo. Dec. 28, 2020), ECF No. 133. The Court finds that the objective of judicial efficiency is served by staying the instant proceeding pending resolution of Petitioner's 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion for compassionate release in the Eastern District of Missouri.

The Court “may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue.” U.S. ex rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc., 971 F.2d 244, 248 (9th Cir. 1992) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). See also United States v. Raygoza-Garcia, 902 F.3d 994, 1001 (9th Cir. 2018) (“A court may take judicial notice of undisputed matters of public record, which may include court records available through PACER.”).

The Court notes, however, that such a stay should not be indefinite, and the Court may revisit the stay in the event that resolution of the § 3582 motion is unduly prolonged.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's motion to stay (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED; and

2. Respondent shall file a status report regarding Petitioner's pending 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion and any appeal on or before February 1, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Capps v. Ciolli

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 21, 2021
1:20-cv-00766-SAB-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Capps v. Ciolli

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS CAPPS, Petitioner, v. CIOLLI, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00766-SAB-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021)