From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capolongo v. Giant Carpet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2002
292 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-11662

Argued January 31, 2002.

March 5, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated November 28, 2000, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Brophy and Laub, White Plains, N.Y. (Sandra D. Janin of counsel), for appellants.

Charles X. Connick, PLLC, Mineola, N.Y. (Smetana Schwartz [Stuart Haas and Joyce G. Bigelow] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While shopping at the defendant's carpet store, the plaintiff Pauline Capolongo was injured when a 12-foot x 15-foot carpet and the metal beam from which it was hanging fell down upon her. The plaintiffs sought summary judgment on the issue of liability based upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Summary judgment was properly denied. Without deciding whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable in this case, we note that the doctrine is a rule of evidence which merely provides a permissible inference of negligence rather than a presumption (see, Dermatossian v. New York City Tr. Auth., 67 N.Y.2d 219, 226; Vaynberg v. Provident Operating Corp., 269 A.D.2d 442; Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, 247 A.D.2d 429). Therefore, application of the doctrine as a basis for awarding summary judgment is inappropriate (see, Vaynberg v. Provident Operating Corp., supra; Davis v. Federated Dept. Stores, 227 A.D.2d 514).

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, FLORIO and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Capolongo v. Giant Carpet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2002
292 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Capolongo v. Giant Carpet

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE CAPOLONGO, ET AL., appellants, v. GIANT CARPET, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 680

Citing Cases

Paretta v. Med. Offices for Human Reproduction

At the outset, and most important, it is well settled that application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine as a…

Paretta v. HUMAN REPRODUCTION

On this record, however, the court will not award the Parettas summary judgment. At the outset, and most…