From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capodilupo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 25, 2008
985 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3D08-1291.

June 25, 2008.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John C. Schlesinger, Judge.

John Capodilupo, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b)(1) (discussing what constitutes newly discovered evidence, for the purposes of filing a rule 3.850 motion outside of the two-year time window); Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424, 431 (Fla. 2002) ("[N]either the trial court nor counsel has a duty to advise a defendant that the defendant's plea in a pending case may have sentence enhancing consequences on a sentence imposed for a crime committed in the future."); Bolyea v. State, 508 So.2d 457, 459 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987) ("A probationer, whether or not incarcerated as a condition of probation, is `in custody' for purposes of rule 3.850 and may seek postconviction relief pursuant to that rule.").


Summaries of

Capodilupo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 25, 2008
985 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Capodilupo v. State

Case Details

Full title:John CAPODILUPO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 25, 2008

Citations

985 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)