It is insufficient to generally refer to a comparator with a just a first name and no other identifying information. See Summers v. Children's Hosp. of Phila., No. 21-cv-3479, 2022 WL 4120283, at *7 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 9, 2022) (finding comparator evidence insufficient where Plaintiff only knew one employee's first name with no identifying info); see also Caple v. Daiichi Sankyo U.S. Pharma, Inc., No. 10-cv-1271, 2011 WL 6412073, at *9 n.14 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2011) (same). Similarly, a group of purported comparators may not be identified generically just by their race. See Mojica v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., No. 15-cv-1418, 2016 WL 107844, at *5 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2016) (granting summary judgment where “[t]he only comparators Plaintiff purports to identify with respect to any of these situation[s] are unidentified ‘white guys'.... Plaintiff speaks entirely in general, without any kind of particularity or even numbers of employees, and certainly no names.”).