Opinion
2:20-cv-1382-JCM-VCF 3:22-cv-335-MMD-CLB
04-11-2023
PAYNE & FEARS LLP Scott S. Thomas, Esq. Sarah J. Odia, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation MORALES FIERRO & REEVES Ramiro Morales, Esq. William Reeves, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company Thomas E. McGrath, Esq. Henderson, Attorneys for Defendant RHP Mechanical Systems
PAYNE & FEARS LLP Scott S. Thomas, Esq. Sarah J. Odia, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation
MORALES FIERRO & REEVES Ramiro Morales, Esq. William Reeves, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company
Thomas E. McGrath, Esq. Henderson, Attorneys for Defendant RHP Mechanical Systems
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NOS. 164, 165, AND 166)
(FIRST REQUEST)
TO THE HONORABLE COURT, AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation, as assignee of United Construction Company (“CapSpecialty”), Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company (“Steadfast”), and Defendant RHP Mechanical Systems (“RHP”), hereby stipulate to extend the deadlines for interested parties to file opposition and reply briefs to the Motions for Summary Judgment filed with this Court on April 7, 2023 (ECF Nos. 164, 165, and 166) (collectively "Motions").
Per the agreement of the parties, and subject to this Court's approval, the deadline to oppose the Motions shall be extended from April 28, 2023, to May 19, 2023. Meanwhile, per the agreement of the parties and subject to this Court's approval, the deadline to file reply briefs in connection with the Motions shall be extended to June 2, 2023.
The parties are actively moving this case forward. The request to extend dates is due to the complexity of the issues raised in the brief as well as the fact that counsel for CapSpecialty has responses to dispositive motions due in another, unrelated case on April 28, 2023. Accordingly. the parties stipulate and agree that the requested extension is being made without prejudice to other orders previously made or to be made by the Court.
In accordance with LR IA 6-1, there have been no prior extensions solely to extend the responses to Motions for Summary Judgment; there have been seven prior stipulations for the extension of time regarding discovery deadlines (ECF No. 150).
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. All parties have until May 19, 2023, to file responses to Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 164, 165, and 166), and to June 2, 2023 to file replies in support of the Motions for Summa1y Judgment.