From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capitol Specialty Ins. Corp. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 23, 2022
2:20-cv-1382-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1382-JCM-VCF

11-23-2022

CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, as assignee of UNITED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; RHP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, a Nevada corporation; and AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendants.

PAYNE & FEARS LLP MORALES FIERRO & REEVES Sarah J. Odia, Esq. William C. Reeves, Esq.


PAYNE & FEARS LLP

MORALES FIERRO & REEVES

Sarah J. Odia, Esq.

William C. Reeves, Esq.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]-ORDER REGARDING RAMIE MORALES SUBPOENAS AND TO VACATE NOVEMBER 30, 2022 HEARING (ECF No. 134) ON STEADFAST'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 109)

PLAINTIFF Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation (“CapSpecialty”) and Defendant STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY (“Steadfast”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby STIPULATE and agree as follows:

WHEREAS Steadfast filed a Motion for Protective Order ("Motion") on July 26, 2022 (ECF No. 109) seeking to bar CapSpecialty from enforcing subpoenas served on Attorney Ramiro Morales ("Morales Subpoenas")

WHEREAS, the Motion is currently scheduled to be hear on November 30, 2022 [ECF No. 134];

WHEREAS Steadfast and CapSpecialty previously agreed that the testimony of Chris Ford (via deposition or at trial) is binding upon Steadfast;

WHEREAS CapSpecialty and Steadfast (collectively "Parties"), having met and conferred, hereby agree as follows:

1. CapSpecialty will withdraw the Morales Subpoenas and Steadfast will withdraw the Motion;

2. The Parties agree to not elicit testimony from Ramiro Morales at trial. This prohibition includes the use of any affidavits or declarations by Attorney Morales as well as live and recorded testimony; and

3. Steadfast agrees that Chris Ford is Steadfast's designated corporate witness under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) and Mr. Ford's testimony, including his June 2, 2022 deposition testimony, is binding upon Steadfast.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, orders as follows:

1. The Morales Subpoenas and Motion are withdrawn;

2. The Parties may not elicit testimony from Ramiro Morales at trial. This prohibition includes the use of any affidavits or declarations by Attorney Morales as well as live and recorded testimony;

3. The Court hereby vacates the November 30, 2022 hearing on the Motion; and

4. The testimony of Chris Ford, including his June 2, 2022 deposition testimony, is binding upon Steadfast.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for protective order (ECF No. 109), is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Capitol Specialty Ins. Corp. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 23, 2022
2:20-cv-1382-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Capitol Specialty Ins. Corp. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, as…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-1382-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)