Opinion
SC: 148947 SC: 148948 SC: 148949 SC: 148950 SC: 148951
09-05-2014
CAPITAL ONE BANK USA N.A., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v. ROBERT F. PONTE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant, and MYCAR INSURANCE GUIDE.COM, Defendant, and SHERMETA ADAMS & VON ALLMEN PC, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee, and WENDY S. REINHARDT, Personal Representative of the Estate of PAMELA PONTE, AMERICAN CENTURY INVESTMENT SECURITIES INC., KEITH REDLIN, THOMAS COLBY, and SPENCER PONTE, Third-Party Defendants. CAPITAL ONE BANK USA N.A., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v. ROBERT F. PONTE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant, and SHERMETA ADAMS & VON ALLMEN PC, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee, and WENDY S. REINHARDT, Personal Representative of the Estate of PAMELA PONTE, AMERICAN CENTURY INVESTMENT SERVICES INC., KEITH REDLIN, THOMAS COLBY, and SPENCER PONTE, Third-Party Defendants. CAPITAL ONE BANK USA N.A., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v. ROBERT F. PONTE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant, and SHERMETA ADAMS & VON ALLMEN PC, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee, and WENDY S. REINHARDT, Personal Representative of the Estate of PAMELA PONTE, CONSTANCE L. JONES, and MARTIN E. BLANK, Third-Party Defendants. CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA N.A., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v ROBERT F. PONTE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant, and SHERMETA ADAMS & VON ALLMEN PC, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee, and WENDY S. REINHARDT, Personal Representative of the Estate of PAMELA PONTE, AMERICAN CENTURY INVESTMENT SERVICES INC., KEITH REDLIN, THOMAS COLBY, and SPENCER PONTE, Third-Party Defendants.
Order
148947-51 & (71) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, Justices COA: 307664
Washtenaw CC: 10-000722-CK
COA: 308159
Washtenaw CC: 11-000762-CK
COA: 308160
Washtenaw CC: 11-000763-CK
COA: 308161
Washtenaw CC: 11-000998-CK
COA: 308163
Washtenaw CC: 11-000999-CK
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to strike is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
September 5, 2014
/s/_________
Clerk