From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital Mach. Co. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
Jun 14, 2012
2012-1288 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 14, 2012)

Opinion

2012-1288

06-14-2012

CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC. AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, AND WILLIAM L. KOSS, Counterclaim Defendant, v. MILLER VENEERS, INC., Defendant/Counter claimant-Appellee, AND THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants / Counter claimants-Appellees.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in case no. 09-CV-0702, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Capital Machine Company, Inc. and Indiana Forge, LLC (Capital Machine) move for leave to file a corresponding brief pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 32(e). Miller Veneers et al. respond. Capital Machine replies. Miller Veneers moves for leave to file a surreply, with surreply attached.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted. Both parties may, if they choose, file corresponding briefs pursuant to Fed. Cir. Rule 32(e).

FOR THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Michael A. Swift, Esq.

Paul B. Overhauser, Esq.

James L. McNeely, Esq.

s24


Summaries of

Capital Mach. Co. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
Jun 14, 2012
2012-1288 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Capital Mach. Co. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC. AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

2012-1288 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 14, 2012)