From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital Holding Company v. Stavrolakes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1998
92 N.Y.2d 1009 (N.Y. 1998)

Opinion

Argued November 18, 1998

Decided December 17, 1998

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Shirley W. Kornreich, J.).

Belkin Burden Wenig Goldman, L. L. P., New York City ( Magda L. Cruz, Sherwin Belkin and Jay H. Berg of counsel), for appellant.

Fishman Neil, New York City ( Steven A. Neil and Richard L. Levenson of counsel), for Rena Stavrolakes, respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 242 A.D.2d 240). Certified question not answered as unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY.


Summaries of

Capital Holding Company v. Stavrolakes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1998
92 N.Y.2d 1009 (N.Y. 1998)
Case details for

Capital Holding Company v. Stavrolakes

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL HOLDING COMPANY, Appellant, v. RENA STAVROLAKES et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 1998

Citations

92 N.Y.2d 1009 (N.Y. 1998)
684 N.Y.S.2d 477
707 N.E.2d 432

Citing Cases

ROXBOROUGH APTS. v. Becker

Tenant admits that three roommates reside within the premises, a four-bedroom apartment. However, the court…

Roxborough Apartments Corp. v. Becker

Tenant admits that three roommates reside within the premises, a four-bedroom apartment. However, the court…