From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital Bank v. Manguart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 26, 1989
549 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-523.

September 26, 1989.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ronald M. Friedman, Judge.

Ullman Ullman, and Michael W. Ullman, and Carlos L. De Zayas, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Frank Pintado, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART, and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant Capital Bank appeals from a post-judgment order granting a motion for a protective order directing that the deposition of a nonparty witness, not be had. We quash the protective order. The deposition sought can proceed subject to claims of privilege to be brought before the trial court. See Young, Stern Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The protective order is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Capital Bank v. Manguart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 26, 1989
549 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Capital Bank v. Manguart

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL BANK, APPELLANT, v. TONY MANGUART, A/K/A TONY M. MANGUART, ETC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 26, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)