CAO Grp., Inc. v. Biolase Tech., Inc.

Full title: CAO GROUP, INC., Appellant v. BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2017

2016-1664 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1664

01-27-2017

CAO GROUP, INC., Appellant v. BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee

H. DICKSON BURTON, TraskBritt, PC, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. JEFFREY GUNN, STEPHEN E. PULLEY. JOSHUA LEE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,271.

JUDGMENT

H. DICKSON BURTON, TraskBritt, PC, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. JEFFREY GUNN, STEPHEN E. PULLEY. JOSHUA LEE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 27, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court