From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantwell v. Delaney

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 15, 1933
166 A. 198 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Submitted February 17, 1933 —

Decided May 15, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 783.

For the respondent, Simon Englander.

For the appellants, William F. Delaney.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, DILL, JJ. 9.

For reversal — LLOYD, CASE, VAN BUSKIRK, WELLS, JJ. 4.


Summaries of

Cantwell v. Delaney

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 15, 1933
166 A. 198 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Cantwell v. Delaney

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTA H. CANTWELL, RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE DELANEY ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 15, 1933

Citations

166 A. 198 (N.J. 1933)
166 A. 198

Citing Cases

Bertsch v. Jones

Prosecutrix was an employee. Cantwell v. Delaney, 10 N.J. Mis. R. 783; 110 N.J.L. 554; Jasnig v. Winter, 115…