From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantwell v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 5, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00966-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00966-AP

08-05-2011

MICHAEL CANTWELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Gregory J. Styduhar 125 West B Street Pueblo, CO 1003 For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office STEPHANIE LYNN F. KILEY Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Gregory J. Styduhar

125 West B Street

Pueblo, CO 1003

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

KEVIN TRASKOS

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

United States Attorney's Office

STEPHANIE LYNN F. KILEY

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 04/12/2011

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 05/20/2011

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 07/19/2011

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties state that there are no other matters.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: 09/19/2011

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 10/19/2011

C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 11/03/2011

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States

Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:

For Plaintiff:

Gregory J. Styduhar

125 West B Street

Pueblo, CO 1003

719-543-9591

greg@konciljaandkoncilja.com

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

KEVIN TRASKOS

Deputy Chief, Civil Division

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov

STEPHANIE LYNN F. KILEY

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A

Denver, CO 80294

Telephone: (303) 844-0815

Stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov


Summaries of

Cantwell v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 5, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00966-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Cantwell v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CANTWELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00966-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 5, 2011)