From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantu v. Ward

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
1:20-cv-00386-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00386-NONE-HBK

08-30-2021

JOSHUA JESS CANTU, Plaintiff, v. FNU WARD, ET. AL., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME

(Doc. No. 24)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is an ex parte motion for enlargement of time filed on behalf of Defendants D. Cortez, P. Dunn, P. Ward, B. Xiong, and J. A. Soto including a support declaration from counsel on August 20, 2021. (Doc. No. 24). Defendants request an order to extend the deadline for the filing of a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Id.).

Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) provides for extending deadlines for good cause shown, if the request to extend time is made before the original time, or its extension expires; or, on a motion made after the time has expired, if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect. Additionally, Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4) permits a court to modify a scheduling order for good cause shown and with the judge's consent. Here, Defendants filed their motion before the time expired and have established good cause to extend their deadline to respond to the FAC.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendants' motion for an enlargement of time (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED.

2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint no later than October 22, 2021.


Summaries of

Cantu v. Ward

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
1:20-cv-00386-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Cantu v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA JESS CANTU, Plaintiff, v. FNU WARD, ET. AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00386-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)