From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantu v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 18, 2009
No. 04-08-00638-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. 04-08-00638-CR

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2006-CR-2113, Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding. AFFIRMED.

Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Guadalupe Dionicio Cantu pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance and received deferred adjudication community supervision for four years. The State then filed a motion to enter adjudication of guilt and revoke community supervision. At the hearing on the motion, Cantu pled true to having violated the conditions of his community supervision and was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Cantu timely filed a notice of appeal. Cantu's court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief in which she concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Cantu did not file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 68.4.


Summaries of

Cantu v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 18, 2009
No. 04-08-00638-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Cantu v. State

Case Details

Full title:Guadalupe Dionicio CANTU, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Mar 18, 2009

Citations

No. 04-08-00638-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)