From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantrell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 17, 1993
858 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63418.

August 17, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; THOMAS O'SHEA, JUDGE.

David Cantrell, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the dismissal, for untimely filing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cantrell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 17, 1993
858 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Cantrell v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID CANTRELL, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Aug 17, 1993

Citations

858 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)