From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cansler v. Arch Chemicals, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jul 27, 2012
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00023-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00023-AWI-GSA

07-27-2012

NADINE CANSLER, Plaintiff, v. ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING

STIPULATION FOR RE: VIDEO

CONFERENCE DEPOSITION


(Doc. 22)

On July 23, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation that the following depositions will be taken via video conference : Michael Villegas, Sharon Harvey, ShaRonda Hoxie, Vicki Pringle, and Kyoko Roberts. The parties have also stipulated that the videotaped depositions may be used at trial pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Court adopts the stipulation relating to the videotaping of the deposition, but does not adopt the stipulation that the videotaped deposition will be can be used at trial. Any motion related to the use of videotaped testimony at trial will need to be presented to the trial judge and will be adjudicated accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cansler v. Arch Chemicals, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jul 27, 2012
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00023-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Cansler v. Arch Chemicals, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NADINE CANSLER, Plaintiff, v. ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. and DOES 1 through 50…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00023-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)