Opinion
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00023-AWI-GSA
01-12-2012
NADINE CANSLER, Plaintiff, v. ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
HOPPE LAW GROUP Theodore W. Hoppe Attorneys for Defendant ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. LAW OFFICES OF ERIC P. OREN Eric P. Oren Attorneys for Plaintiff NADINE CANSLER.
Theodore W. Hoppe #138064
HOPPE LAW GROUP
A PROFESSIONAL LAW OFFICE
Randall S. Thompson #45581 (pro hac vice forthcoming) HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
The Plaza in Clayton Office Tower
Laura B. Staley #52092 (pro hac vice forthcoming)
HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
Attorneys for Defendant, ARCH CHEMICALS, INC.
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ALLOW ARCH
CHEMICALS, INC TO APPEAR AND RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, NADINE CANSLER, ("Plaintiff") and Defendant, ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. ("Defendant"), by and through their attorneys of record, agree as follows:
Plaintiff, NADINE CANSLER agrees that Defendant, ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. shall have through and including January 20, 2012 to respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on November 18, 2011 in the Tulare County Superior Court.
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED, pending a further order of the Court, that Defendant, ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. be allowed to appear and respond on or before January 20, 2012 to the Complaint filed on November 18, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
HOPPE LAW GROUP
By: _________________
Theodore W. Hoppe
Attorneys for Defendant
ARCH CHEMICALS, INC.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF ERIC P. OREN
By: _________________
Eric P. Oren
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NADINE CANSLER.
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Defendant, ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. is hereby granted an extension through January 20, 2012 to file a response to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE