Opinion
Civil Action 22-cv-10695
10-31-2022
DARIO CANOY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al. Defendants.
MAG. CURTIS IVY, JR., JUDGE
OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT
Bernard A. Friedman, Senior United States District Judge
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr.'s September 28, 2022 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 29). The report recommends that the Court (1) grant the Michigan State Police and the Detroit Police Department's separate motions to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice, and (2) deny plaintiff Dario Canoy's motion to strike those dismissal motions as moot. (ECF Nos. 24-25, 27). None of the parties objected to the report and recommendation pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2).
This Court had an opportunity to fully review the matter and believes the magistrate judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy Jr.'s September 28, 2022 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is hereby accepted and adopted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Michigan State Police and the Detroit Police Department's respective motions to dismiss the amended complaint (ECF Nos. 24-25) are granted with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Canoy's motion to strike the dismissal motions (ECF No. 27) is denied as moot. There are no remaining claims in this matter.