From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canonico v. Canonico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1996
224 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 27, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (John DiNoto, J.).


The IAS Court's requirement that defendant pay the entire parties' combined monthly child support calculated in accordance with the Child Support Standards Act (Domestic Relations Law § 240) was proper in light of the fact that plaintiff must pay all monthly residential costs for herself and the parties' two children. The record does not support defendant's claim that the support provisions are so prohibitive as to prevent him from meeting his own financial obligations. To the extent any inequities may exist under the pendente lite order, the remedy is to proceed to a speedy trial ( Hills v. Hills, 182 A.D.2d 584).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Canonico v. Canonico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1996
224 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Canonico v. Canonico

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA CANONICO, Respondent, v. DAVID CANONICO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 57