From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cano v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 7, 1962
355 S.W.2d 536 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)

Opinion

No. 34343.

March 7, 1962.

Appeal from the County Court, Ellis County, Milton Hartsfield, J.

Doss Hardin, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Bruce Allen, County Atty., Waxahachie, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 90 days in jail and a fine of $150.00.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

Appellant's sole contention, which is presented by formal bill of exception No. 1, is that the complaint did not have the same file number as the information and was not attached to the information.

The complaint and information before us appear to have been filed on the same day and are regular on their face.

There is no motion to quash the information in the record, and our consideration of the alleged error is precluded by Article 523, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., and our holdings in Billingslea v. State, 160 Tex.Crim. R., 268 S.W.2d 668, and Howard v. State, 157 Tex.Crim. R., 247 S.W.2d 112.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Cano v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 7, 1962
355 S.W.2d 536 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
Case details for

Cano v. State

Case Details

Full title:Catarino H. CANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 7, 1962

Citations

355 S.W.2d 536 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)