From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CANO v. BAKER

U.S.
Oct 10, 2006
549 U.S. 972 (2006)

Opinion

No. 06-162.

October 10, 2006.

Reported below: 435 F. 3d 1337.


Certiorari denied

C.A. 11th Cir. Motions of Suzanne Besser et al., J. Budziszewski, Texas Black Americans for Life et al., and

*See Davis v. State, 986 S. W. 2d 368, 370 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (en banc) ("A defendant who has been discharged from deferred adjudication [probation] is immediately eligible to serve on a jury, to vote, and to be recommended for probation by a jury after a finding of guilty at a subsequent trial" (footnotes omitted)); Ex parte Laday, 594 S. W. 2d 102, 104 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980) (en banc) ("The whole point of [the deferred adjudication probation] statute is to avoid having to formally adjudicate the defendant's guilt unless and until he demonstrates that he cannot abide by the terms of probation set by the court. If the defendant successfully completes his probation, his offense is essentially expunged"). Nurturing Network et al. for leave to file briefs as amid curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

CANO v. BAKER

U.S.
Oct 10, 2006
549 U.S. 972 (2006)
Case details for

CANO v. BAKER

Case Details

Full title:CANO, FKA DOE v. BAKER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GEORGIA, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 10, 2006

Citations

549 U.S. 972 (2006)
127 S. Ct. 387