Cannon v. U.S.

Full title: ANTONIO CANNON, Appellant, v. U.S., Appellee

Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 2, 2004

No. 00-CF-811 (D.C. Mar. 2, 2004)

Opinion

No. 00-CF-811

Filed March 2, 2004

F81-00

Before: TERRY and REID, Associate Judges; FERREN, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing and request to stay issuance of mandate, appellee's response, and appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged reply, it is

ORDERED that appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged reply is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply to response to petition. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that footnote 1 of the opinion filed in this case on December 18, 2003, reported at 838 A.2d 293, is amended to read as follows:

The first theft count was for theft of a cellular phone, while the other two counts were based on appellant's use of the phone. Only the first theft count went to trial, along with the count that charged receiving stolen property; the other two counts were dismissed before trial.