From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
308 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1464

12-18-2020

Charles E. CANNON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Charles E. Cannon, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Charles E. Cannon, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

As Petitioner has not established any departure from the essential requirements of law or irreparable harm, the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Reed v. State , 116 So. 3d 260, 267 (Fla. 2013) ; CQB, 2010, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon , 177 So. 3d 644, 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Osterhaus, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cannon v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
308 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Cannon v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. CANNON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

308 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)