From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. Kopotoski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-1046 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-CV-1046

08-29-2012

JIMMY CANNON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. KOPOTOSKI, et al. Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE MANNION)


ORDER

NOW this 29th day of August, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion (Doc. 57) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 57) is ADOPTED.
(2) The Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. 1) and amended complaint (Doc. 26) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Local Rule 83.3.1.
(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE all other pending motions.
(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.

____________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cannon v. Kopotoski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-1046 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Cannon v. Kopotoski

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY CANNON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. KOPOTOSKI, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-CV-1046 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2012)