Cannon v. Garman

Full title: DONTE CANNON, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT GARMAN et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Civil Action 19-09 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-09

03-29-2022

DONTE CANNON, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT GARMAN et al., Respondents

GENE E.K. PRATTER, United Status District Judge.

ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER, United Status District Judge.

AND NOW, this 29^th day of March, 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of pro se Petitioner Donte Cannon's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Respondents' Response to the Petition (Doc. No. 18), Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 36), Mr. Cannon's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 44), and Mr. Cannon's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 45), for the reasons provided in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 36) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. Mr. Cannon's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 45) is DENIED,

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED, including for statistical purposes.