From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. Gallahger

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:18-cv-666-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-666-NONE-HBK

08-31-2021

KELVIN CANNON, Plaintiff, v. FNU GALLAHGER, ET. AL., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY

(DOC. NO. 83)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court Defendants' second motion for enlargement of time to file a reply and supporting declaration filed on behalf of Defendants Perez, Wilson, Shelby, Vang, Curtis, Kong, Hernandez, Gamboa, Gonsalves, Podsakoff, Rocha, Flores, Brandon, Forrest, and Gallagher on August 30, 2021. (Doc. No. 83). Defendants note their current deadline to reply is September 1, 2021, and request until September 14, 2021 to now reply. (Id. at 1).

Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) provides for extending deadlines for good cause shown, if the request to extend time is made before the original time, or its extension expires; or, on a motion made after the time has expired, if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect. Additionally, Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4) permits a court to modify a scheduling order for good cause shown and with the judge's consent. Here, Defendants filed their motion before the time expired and have established good cause to extend their deadline.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendants' motion for an enlargement of time (Doc. No. 83) is GRANTED.

2. Defendants shall file a reply no later than September 14, 2021.


Summaries of

Cannon v. Gallahger

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:18-cv-666-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Cannon v. Gallahger

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN CANNON, Plaintiff, v. FNU GALLAHGER, ET. AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-666-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)