From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 6, 1979
260 S.E.2d 19 (Ga. 1979)

Opinion

34960.

SUBMITTED JUNE 1, 1979.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1979. REHEARING DENIED SEPTEMBER 25, 1979.

Domestication of foreign divorce and alimony decree. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Williford, Senior Judge.

Finestone Cardon, Wayne L. Cardon, for appellant.

Charles A. Evans, for appellee.


In this case, a North Carolina judgment based upon a contract of separation was incorporated into a Georgia divorce decree on the issues of alimony, child support and custody at the wife's request and over the husband's objection. See Shepherd v. Shepherd, 241 Ga. 484 ( 246 S.E.2d 183) (1978). The North Carolina contract, which included a provision not to contest a later divorce, is clearly void as against the public policy of this state. Birch v. Anthony, 109 Ga. 349 ( 34 S.E. 561) (1899). The issue here is whether that North Carolina judgment is nevertheless entitled to full faith and credit. We hold that it is and affirm.

In Campbell v. Campbell, 231 Ga. 214 ( 200 S.E.2d 899) (1973), we held that an Indiana consent judgment on a separation agreement settling the issues of alimony, child support and child custody was entitled to full faith and credit. Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541 (1948), Coe v. Coe, 334 U.S. 378 (1948). See Sherrer v. Sherrer, 334 U.S. 343 (1948); Davis v. Davis, 305 U.S. 32 (1938). That here the North Carolina consent judgment contains a clause making it void as against the public policy of this state does not change this rule. It is clear that local policy considerations must give way to this constitutional provision. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt, 320 U.S. 430 (1943). For example, in Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908), a Missouri judgment was entitled to full faith and credit in Mississippi even though it was based on a gambling debt unenforceable in Mississippi. The trial court correctly recognized that the North Carolina alimony judgment was entitled to full faith and credit and did not err in incorporating it in the divorce decree.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED JUNE 1, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1979 — REHEARING DENIED SEPTEMBER 25, 1979.


Summaries of

Cannon v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 6, 1979
260 S.E.2d 19 (Ga. 1979)
Case details for

Cannon v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:CANNON v. CANNON

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 6, 1979

Citations

260 S.E.2d 19 (Ga. 1979)
260 S.E.2d 19

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Whaley

Limiting the application of OCGA § 19-6-19 (a) to multiple petitions filed in this state is appropriate to…

Hargreaves v. Greate Bay Hotel Casino

OCGA § 13-8-2 (a) (4). Although fully aware that gambling is against the public policy of Georgia, we note…