From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannedy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2017
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-205 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-205

09-21-2017

CARLA JO CANNEDY AND STEVEN QUINTON CANNEDY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a/k/a WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 5, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #42) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Dkt. #9) be DENIED.

Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 21st day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cannedy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2017
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-205 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Cannedy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:CARLA JO CANNEDY AND STEVEN QUINTON CANNEDY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 21, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-205 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2017)

Citing Cases

Newton v. BBVA

Because section 17.028 is mandatory and provides the exclusive methods of service for financial institutions,…