From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannata-Nowell v. Reade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

November 21, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.H.O.), entered July 1, 1999, which granted defendant's motion to vacate its default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Brian O'Leary, for plaintiff-appellant.

Domenick L. D'Angelica, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner, Rubin, JJ.


Defendant's motion to vacate its default in submitting an answer was properly granted (see, Scott v. Fontana, 268 A.D.2d 237). Defendant established a reasonable excuse for its delay by setting forth its diligent efforts to deliver the summons and complaint to the correct insurance company. Defendant also presented an affidavit setting forth a meritorious defense to plaintiff's claim based on its position that plaintiff's injuries were caused solely by the tortious conduct of one of its patrons. Moreover, the brief delay caused no prejudice to plaintiff.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Cannata-Nowell v. Reade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Cannata-Nowell v. Reade

Case Details

Full title:ANITA CANNATA-NOWELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DUANE READE, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 569