From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canini v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 13, 2017
Case No. 16-cv-3309 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-3309 (WMW/BRT)

02-13-2017

Paul Canini, III, Plaintiff, v. Tom Roy, Minnesota DOC Commissioner; and Minnesota Industries "Officials," Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the January 11, 2017 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Dkt. 7.) The R&R recommends dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff Paul Canini, III's complaint for failure to prosecute. No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

ORDER

Based on the R&R and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The January 11, 2017 R&R, (Dkt. 7), is ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff Paul Canini, III's complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: February 13, 2017

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Canini v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 13, 2017
Case No. 16-cv-3309 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Canini v. Roy

Case Details

Full title:Paul Canini, III, Plaintiff, v. Tom Roy, Minnesota DOC Commissioner; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 13, 2017

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-3309 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2017)