From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canfield v. Saukhla

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:18-CV-1092-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-CV-1092-KJM-DMC-P

07-29-2021

DONALD CANFIELD, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to compel, ECF No. 43.

Plaintiffs motion is defective. Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to requests for production. While Plaintiff states that the discovery requests at issue are attached to his motion as Exhibit 1, there is no Exhibit 1 accompanying Plaintiffs motion. Moreover, Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a copy of Defendants' allegedly deficient responses. Absent a copy of the discovery and responses at issue, it is impossible for the Court to evaluate Plaintiffs motion, which is denied without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Canfield v. Saukhla

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:18-CV-1092-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Canfield v. Saukhla

Case Details

Full title:DONALD CANFIELD, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

2:18-CV-1092-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)