From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canfield v. Fallon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 5, 1899
55 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1899)

Opinion

Argued November 21, 1899

Decided December 5, 1899

J. Du Pratt White for appellants.

Thaddeus D. Kenneson and Ralph Wood Kenyon for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the Special Term, and the questions certified answered as follows: Under the will of Isaac I. Blauvelt, a remainder in fee as to the real estate, and in absolute ownership as to the personal property, in an undivided one-half of all the property, real and personal, left at his death vested in his granddaughter, Julia Frances Archer, which was not divested by her death in the lifetime of her mother, but passed to the latter as her sole heir and next of kin, who had the power to dispose of the same by will.

All concur.


Summaries of

Canfield v. Fallon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 5, 1899
55 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1899)
Case details for

Canfield v. Fallon

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC B. CANFIELD, Respondent, v . ANDREW X. FALLON et al., as Executors…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 5, 1899

Citations

55 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1899)
55 N.E. 1093

Citing Cases

Vande Mark v. Woodward

What the testator wished to occur was that title would be in those whom he knew at the time of his death and…