From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canete v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 1, 2018
CASE NO. CV 15-316-RGK (JCG) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 15-316-RGK (JCG)

05-01-2018

RALPH NICOLAS CANETE, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: May 1, 2018

/s/_________

R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Canete v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 1, 2018
CASE NO. CV 15-316-RGK (JCG) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Canete v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:RALPH NICOLAS CANETE, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. CV 15-316-RGK (JCG) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2018)