From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Candray v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 10, 2009
1:08-cv-01977-AWI-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2009)

Opinion

1:08-cv-01977-AWI-SMS (HC).

March 10, 2009


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOCUMENT #12) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 25, 2009, petitioner filed a motion to extend time to file objections to findings and recommendations. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file objections to findings and recommendations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Candray v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 10, 2009
1:08-cv-01977-AWI-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Candray v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO CANDRAY, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 10, 2009

Citations

1:08-cv-01977-AWI-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2009)