From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Candray v. Eicher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 2005
19 A.D.3d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-09659.

June 6, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated October 8, 2004, which denied his motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.21 (d) for leave to depose a nonparty witness.

William M. Weisberg, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Agen Stenz, Westbury, N.Y. (Effy Belessis of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to depose a nonparty witness, made after the filing of the note of issue and certificate of readiness. The plaintiff failed to offer any evidence of unusual or unanticipated circumstances subsequent to the filing such as would require additional pretrial proceedings to prevent substantial prejudice ( see Gigliotti v. Allstate Ins. Co., 258 AD2d 559; Scocozza v. Tolia, 254 AD2d 475).


Summaries of

Candray v. Eicher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 2005
19 A.D.3d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Candray v. Eicher

Case Details

Full title:GILBERTO CANDRAY, Appellant, v. FRANCES M. EICHER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Tortola v. NHT Owners, LLC

The defendants failed to demonstrate that unusual or unanticipated circumstances occurred after the filing of…