From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Candler v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:19-cv-0819 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0819 TLN AC P

06-01-2021

KEITH W. CANDLER, Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed April 12, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id at 6-7. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one days of the service of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning.


Summaries of

Candler v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:19-cv-0819 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Candler v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:KEITH W. CANDLER, Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-0819 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)