From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Candle v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 15, 1994
69 Ohio St. 3d 429 (Ohio 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2317

Submitted May 11, 1994 —

Decided June 15, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 92 C.A. 18.

Aronson, Fineman Davis Co., L.P.A., Kellie S. Kontnier and William J. Davis; C. Bruce Williams; Landskroner Phillips Co., L.P.A., and Lawrence Landskroner, for appellants.

Vogelgesang, Howes, Lindamood Brunn and Philip E. Howes, for appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation.

James A. Philomena, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathi McNabb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Board of Commissioners of Mahoning County.


The judgment on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Carpenter v. Consol. Rail Corp. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 259, 631 N.E.2d 607.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Candle v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 15, 1994
69 Ohio St. 3d 429 (Ohio 1994)
Case details for

Candle v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CANDLE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 15, 1994

Citations

69 Ohio St. 3d 429 (Ohio 1994)
633 N.E.2d 515

Citing Cases

Rembowski v. Rudolph/Libbe Inc.

"[W]hen two or more independent contractors are engaged in work on the same premises, it is the duty of each…

Smith v. Peck Hannaford Briggs Co., Inc.

Kucharski v. Natl. Eng. Contracting Co. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 430, 633 N.E.2d 515. Id. at 434, 633 N.E.2d…