From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Candelaria v. Nardil

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 11, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2016-07264

10-11-2017

In the Matter of Rolando Candelaria, appellant, v. Vanessa Nardil, et al., respondents.

Michael E. Lipson, Jericho, NY, for appellant. Warren & Warren, P.C., Brooklyn, NY (Ira L. Eras of counsel), for respondent Everlidess Maldonado. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Aaron M. Bloom of counsel), for respondent Administration for Children's Services.


SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX COLLEEN D. DUFFY FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ. (Docket Nos. V-6065-16, V-6066-16)

Michael E. Lipson, Jericho, NY, for appellant.

Warren & Warren, P.C., Brooklyn, NY (Ira L. Eras of counsel), for respondent Everlidess Maldonado.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Aaron M. Bloom of counsel), for respondent Administration for Children's Services.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the petitioner from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Edward W. Yuskevich, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated April 21, 2016. The order dismissed, without a hearing, the petition for visitation, with prejudice.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court lacks the authority to direct continuing contact between a parent and child where, as here, the petitioning parent's parental rights have been involuntarily terminated and the children have been freed for adoption (see Matter of Hailey ZZ. [Ricky ZZ.], 19 NY3d 432, 438; Matter of Joshua J.C. [Jose C.], 145 AD3d 883, 884-885; Matter of Jamel D.G. [Monique G.], 108 AD3d 766, 767). Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed, without a hearing, the petition for visitation, with prejudice.

BALKIN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Candelaria v. Nardil

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 11, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Candelaria v. Nardil

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Rolando Candelaria, appellant, v. Vanessa Nardil, et al.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)