From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canandaigua National Bank Trust v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 1, 1999

Appeal from Amended Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, Jr., J. — Money Judgment.


Amended judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Henry, Jr., J.). We reject defendants' argument that the award of counsel fees was excessive. The court properly denied defendants' motion to renew because defendants failed to establish that the additional factual material was unavailable at the time of the original motion and cross motion and to provide a valid excuse for failing to submit the material in opposition to the original motion or in support of their cross motion (see, Welch Foods v. Wilson, 247 A.D.2d 830, 830-831; Matter of Hurley v. Avon Cent. School Dist., 187 A.D.2d 983).

PRESENT: LAWTON, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Summaries of

Canandaigua National Bank Trust v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Canandaigua National Bank Trust v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 801