From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canam Sys. v. Lake Buchanan Dev. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 9, 1979
375 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Summary

affirming dismissal of claims against surety and principal where lien was transferred to bond prior to filing of timely lien foreclosure suit and lienor waited three years to assert claims against the bond

Summary of this case from Cool Guys, LLC v. Jomar Properties, LLC

Opinion

No. 78-1008/NT 4-8.

August 22, 1979. Rehearing Denied October 9, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Maurice M. Paul, J.

Irby G. Pugh, Orlando, for appellant-cross-appellee.

Harlan Tuck, of Giles, Hedrick Robinson, Orlando, for appellees-cross-appellants.


Two Claims of Lien filed under the Mechanics' Lien Statute were transferred to bond within a few days after recordation. Less than two weeks later, the mechanics' lienor filed suit to foreclose his liens but failed to name as defendants, either the surety, or the principals on the bond, until he attempted to do so some 3 years later. In granting a motion to dismiss with prejudice, the trial court noted inter alia that suit against the surety and its principals should have been commenced within one year from the date the lien was recorded. We agree and affirm.

Section 713.24(4), Florida Statutes (1973) provides:

If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in § 713.22 or if it appears that the transferred lien has been satisfied of record, the clerk shall return said security upon request of the person depositing or filing the same, or the insurer.

In turn, Section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1973) provides:

Duration of lien. — No lien provided by part I of this chapter shall continue for a longer period than 1 year after the claim of lien has been recorded, unless within that time an action to enforce the lien is commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction.

In the case at bar, no attempt was made to pursue the security of the transferred lien for more than three (3) years after recordation of the claim and the trial court's ruling therefore was obviously correct. The appellants cite American Fire and Casualty Company v. Davis Water Waste Industries, 358 So.2d 225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) as authority for the proposition that the surety and the principals on the bond need not be joined within one (1) year of filing of the claim of lien. However we distinguish that case from the one now before us, because in American Fire the suit was filed before the lien was transferred to bond and, as a result, under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.260(c) the plaintiff's claim was preserved. We confess however that some of the reasoning in point two of our opinion in American Fire was, to say the least, confusing and to the extent it varies with what we say now, we adopt the better reasoning set forth here.

Moreover, a suit to foreclose a recorded lien naming the real estate sought to be impressed, after transfer to bond is improper. Section 713.24(1), Florida Statutes (1973) clearly provides that upon the filing of a certificate of transfer ". . . the real property shall thereupon be released from the lien claimed and such lien shall be transferred to said security." This provision was totally ignored in the suit originally filed until some three (3) years after the filing of the certificate. Under the applicable statutes above cited, it is too late now to attempt modification of the pleadings and joinder of new defendants.

The foregoing being dispositive, we do not address any other matters raised by either party.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, JAMES C. and BERANEK, JOHN R., Associate Judges, concur.


Summaries of

Canam Sys. v. Lake Buchanan Dev. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 9, 1979
375 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

affirming dismissal of claims against surety and principal where lien was transferred to bond prior to filing of timely lien foreclosure suit and lienor waited three years to assert claims against the bond

Summary of this case from Cool Guys, LLC v. Jomar Properties, LLC
Case details for

Canam Sys. v. Lake Buchanan Dev. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CANAM SYSTEMS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 9, 1979

Citations

375 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Pappalardo v. Buck

We do not construe the supreme court's opinion in Buck as authority for imposing this additional obligation…

Hutnick v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Recognizing that only a single cause of action is involved, courts of other jurisdictions have held that if a…