From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canales v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Apr 7, 2005
No. 13-05-122-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)

Opinion

No. 13-05-122-CR

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed April 7, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

Before Justices HINOJOSA, YAÑEZ, and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, EDWARD CANALES, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. Sentence in this cause was imposed on December 13, 2004. No timely motion for new trial was filed. The notice of appeal was due to be filed on January 12, 2005, but was not filed until February 14, 2005. Said notice of appeal is untimely filed. Tex.R.App.P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.


Summaries of

Canales v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Apr 7, 2005
No. 13-05-122-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)
Case details for

Canales v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD CANALES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi

Date published: Apr 7, 2005

Citations

No. 13-05-122-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Canales

Applicant's direct appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Canales v. State, No. 13-05-00122-CR…