Opinion
Civil Action 1:20-CV-77
10-06-2021
RAMIRO CANALES v. DEMETRIA EDISON, et al.,
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Thad Heartfield, United States District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ramiro Canales, an inmate currently confined at the Connally Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Demetria Edison, Daniel J. Quesenberry, Duyean Bui, Annuncia Wright and Michelle Spruell-Smith.
Plaintiff misspelled Defendant Quesenberry's name as Questenberry.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction as moot (Doc. # 87).
The case was initially referred to United Magistrate Judge Keith Giblin who issued the Report and Recommendation. On September 15, 2021, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Christine Stetson (Doc. # 101).
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No. objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.
Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on February 19, 2021 (Doc. # 88). Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections on March 1, 2021 (Doc. # 89). The Motion was granted on March 3, 2021 (Doc. # 91). The only Objections filed by Plaintiff relate to an Order denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summons (Doc. # 92) and another Report and Recommendation entered March 2, 2021 (Doc. # 97).
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED.