Opinion
Civil Action 2:19-CV-00330
07-07-2021
VICTOR HUGO CANALES., Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGEMENT
DAVID S. MORALES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie . K. Hampton's Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), entered on February 3, 2021. (D.E. 57). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's construed motion to alter or amend the judgment (D.E. 56) under Rule 59(e) for failure to identify a manifest error of law or fact or present newly discovered evidence.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FEDR. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. Petitioner timely filed objections to the M&R. (D.E. 64).
The Court has carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of Petitioner, the record, and the applicable law, and finds that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 57). Accordingly, Petitioner's motion is DENIED. (D.E. 56).
SO ORDERED.