From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canady v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Dec 16, 2003
121 S.W.3d 570 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Nos. WD 62467, WD 62596

December 16, 2003

Appeal from Circuit Court of Jackson County, The Honorable Justine Elsa Del Muro, Judge.

John Maurice Schilmoeller, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, John Munson Morris and Stephanie Morrell, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Edwin H. Smith, Presiding Judge, Ronald R. Holliger, Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick, Judge.


ORDER

Appellant Malvin Canady appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without hearing. That motion raised one claim of relief, contending that Canady received ineffective assistance of counsel because he based his decision to plead guilty solely upon the recommendations of plea counsel and was not given the opportunity to make an informed choice about the alternatives available to him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Canady v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Dec 16, 2003
121 S.W.3d 570 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Canady v. State

Case Details

Full title:MALVIN CANADY, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Dec 16, 2003

Citations

121 S.W.3d 570 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)