From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canada v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-1329 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-1329 CKD P

04-24-2018

RONALD LEE CANADA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On March 13, 2018, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 24, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
cana1329.fta


Summaries of

Canada v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-1329 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Canada v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LEE CANADA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-1329 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2018)